我发誓,我从来都没有向这个邮箱发过信,可是我怎么能收到这样的退信呢?
像这样的信要怎么防呢?
以下是我收到退信的内容:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at www257.servergod.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<658richart@pimpedhost.com>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <admin@ylav.com>
Received: (qmail 58272 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2006 07:36:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 218.16.125.158) (218.16.125.158)
by www257.servergod.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2006 07:36:39 -0000
Received: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:35:59 +0800
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:35:59 +0800
From: admin@ylav.com <admin@ylav.com>
To: 658richart@pimpedhost.com <658richart@pimpedhost.com>
Subject: =?GB2312?Q?=D3=CA=BC=FE=CD=B6=B5=DD=B3=AC=CA=B1=B4=ED=CE=F3?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=CE=DE=B7=A8=BD=AB=C4=FA=B5=C4=D3=CA=BC=FE=CD=B6=B5=DD=D6=C1=D2=D4=CF=C2=D6=
=B8=B6=A8=B5=D8=D6=B7:
buraso@ylav.com : =CD=B6=B5=DD=CA=A7=B0=DC, =D5=CA=BA=C5=B2=BB=B4=E6=D4=DA.
----- Original message follows.
Received: from [63.13.175.45]; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:35:59 +0800
From: "Vance Hurd" <440merrick@intimka.com>
To: <buraso@ylav.com> (这个邮箱压根就不存在的)
Subject: Fw: Re: You win 56869$
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 03:34:02 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Thread-Index: spcMr8JoRPK8mfEpyIbP7tcSlaUxr6d1ulNZ
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Good day Buraso.
Roller is the best in the industry because we offer:
{} $888.00 FREE to new depositors
{} Fast Payouts
{} 24-hour support
{} Exciting games
{} A complete and SAFE gaming experience
Give us a try.!! Remember, Free $888.00 is ON THE HOUSE!!.
Start Winning Now!!!!
http://pardaswi.com/e/38/
+++++-----+++++-----+++++-----
consequences result: and yet there are other arguments, not easy tomatter, which is potentially a duct and also potentially possessesdissolution of the many kinds. That is why Empedocles too usesappears utterly other by the 'transposition' of a single constituent.applied: but, though this may be taken to hold of 'contact' as of alldivision is possible, then it might be, at one and the same moment,compounds: those who derive things from a single element are equallyfaulty inference, and exactly where it conceals it. For, since pointequal place: but the parts of the rowing thing expand over an |